Stamp Duty
Since October 2024, the additional dwelling surcharge in England was raised from 3% to 5%. On a £350,000 property, a buy-to-let buyer now pays approximately £25,000 in stamp duty - nearly five times what a first-time buyer would pay. Non-UK residents add another 2% on top of every band.
This calculator computes stamp duty precisely using the tiered band structure, then adds it to your total acquisition cost. Scotland uses LBTT (Land and Buildings Transaction Tax) plus ADS (Additional Dwelling Supplement) at 8% of the full purchase price.
Section 24 and the tax trap
Before April 2020, landlords could deduct mortgage interest in full as a business expense. Section 24 abolished this, replacing it with a flat 20% tax credit on finance costs - regardless of your marginal rate. A 40% taxpayer effectively pays an extra 20% tax on their interest cost.
This calculator models tax correctly: rental income minus deductible expenses (management, maintenance, insurance, void allowance) equals taxable profit - mortgage interest is NOT deducted here, but you receive a 20% credit after computing your tax bill. For highly leveraged higher-rate taxpayers, the after-tax cash-on-cash return can be sharply negative even with healthy gross yields.
Note: This is a simplified Section 24 estimate. HMRC's full calculation limits the 20% credit to the lower of finance costs, property business profits, and adjusted total income. It cannot create a refund, and unused finance costs may carry forward. For edge cases (very low profit or very high interest), this calculator may overstate the tax credit.
How the ETF comparison works
Your total cash invested at year zero - deposit plus all acquisition costs for a mortgage purchase, or full price plus friction for cash - is placed into both scenarios simultaneously. The ETF line grows at the rate you choose, compounding annually (7% reflects VWRA's long-run expectation net of 0.22% TER).
The property line tracks your equity at zero price appreciation: equity = (purchase price minus outstanding loan) plus cumulative after-tax net cash flow. If property equity cannot match the ETF portfolio even at zero growth, the property needs price appreciation to justify the commitment - and the verdict panel tells you exactly how much.
ETF comparison note: The ETF line and property chart lines are shown pre-CGT for a like-for-like comparison. The verdict and what-if tables deduct property CGT but leave the ETF CGT-free, as if the ETF were held in an ISA or SIPP wrapper. For a taxable GIA comparison, ETF CGT would also reduce the ETF terminal value.
Understanding breakeven appreciation
The verdict panel solves for the sale price that makes your property portfolio exactly as large as the ETF portfolio at your chosen hold period - after deducting CGT (calculated on the gain net of SDLT, legal fees, survey costs, and selling costs) and 2% estate agent and legal exit costs.
If that price requires 5% annual appreciation or less, the property is arguably viable - UK national prices have compounded at ~4-5% per annum over 40 years. Requiring 7-8%+ means the property is betting on above-average regional outperformance, which concentrates risk in a single illiquid asset versus a globally diversified ETF.